In this excellent scheme of things you receive a B- just for effort. Where exactly you lost me was first in the details. As it is said, details make or break the argument.. And it could not be more accurate here. Having said that, permit me reveal to you just what exactly did deliver the results. Your article (parts of it) is certainly rather convincing and this is possibly why I am taking the effort to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, whilst I can easily notice the jumps in logic you come up with, I am not sure of how you seem to connect the ideas that produce the actual final result. For the moment I will subscribe to your position however hope in the near future you actually link the dots much better.